frannyo 2 Posted January 15, 2004 Share Posted January 15, 2004 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3393501.stm That sort of thing should be banned Link to post Share on other sites
Bowler 0 Posted January 15, 2004 Share Posted January 15, 2004 This is gonna be a good post! Whys that frannyo? Too old? Link to post Share on other sites
damian 0 Posted January 15, 2004 Share Posted January 15, 2004 I only read it once, and quickly, but that news story confused me: who screwed who and who is the uncle of what and where is the 87 yr old? The concept of uncle.aunty.cousin.neice etc confuses me. Spent a lifetime avoiding them so they are not natural terms for me to use (I actually do not know what a neice/nephew is). Link to post Share on other sites
frannyo 2 Posted January 15, 2004 Author Share Posted January 15, 2004 What do you think Bowler?? Link to post Share on other sites
Yuki's Passion 1 Posted January 15, 2004 Share Posted January 15, 2004 Hey if an 87 year old man can get it up then good on em - especially without the Viagra Im sure the wife knows the situation - pretty obvious that shes with a man who could pass away anytime at that age. If she wants his baby and it makes her happy who are we to judge?? Link to post Share on other sites
KlingKlang 1 Posted January 15, 2004 Share Posted January 15, 2004 Sorry, I think it is totally irresponsible and ridiculous. If she wants his baby and all that is fine, but what about the welfare of the baby? Who are we to have an opinion? Link to post Share on other sites
sweetaz 0 Posted January 15, 2004 Share Posted January 15, 2004 What a stud. She's only 40 so she'll be around to raise the child. Good on them. Link to post Share on other sites
TheOrange 0 Posted January 15, 2004 Share Posted January 15, 2004 It does seem a bit ridiculous. I know nothing about this, but if the bloke is 87 are his menfish doing the biz ok? Is there not some increased chance of there being problems with the baby??? (As I said, I don't know) Link to post Share on other sites
big-will 7 Posted January 15, 2004 Share Posted January 15, 2004 Poor kid. Link to post Share on other sites
kintaro 0 Posted January 15, 2004 Share Posted January 15, 2004 Julio is starting to look like Jack Nicholson Link to post Share on other sites
slimeypete 0 Posted January 15, 2004 Share Posted January 15, 2004 Poor man! Link to post Share on other sites
SKI 15 Posted January 15, 2004 Share Posted January 15, 2004 I wonder what % of 87 year olds are still having sex? Good going, man! Link to post Share on other sites
Bowler 0 Posted January 15, 2004 Share Posted January 15, 2004 i dont see it as any of my business!!! i mean if they wanna have it (or even if they dont) then let 'em. aint owt to do with me. and nor do i have any right to stop 'em! one of my best mates dad is into his 80's now. his dad was mid 60's when he had him. i mean, sure, the old guy could well die soon, very probably when the kid is young or even before he is born, who knows??? but hey, that aint necessarily a reason to ban it!!! Bowler. Link to post Share on other sites
Bowler 0 Posted January 15, 2004 Share Posted January 15, 2004 oh, and yeah... kintaro, i thought that it was jack nicholson at first. spit image!!! Link to post Share on other sites
Weegeoff 0 Posted January 15, 2004 Share Posted January 15, 2004 Did you know that the best position for old people is the women on top so she can do her knitting Link to post Share on other sites
Markie 0 Posted January 15, 2004 Share Posted January 15, 2004 I'm afraid that wouldn't work with me, Weegeoff, I'm cleanly shaven down there to be hygienic. Link to post Share on other sites
nekobi 0 Posted January 16, 2004 Share Posted January 16, 2004 Quote: Originally posted by SKI: I wonder what % of 87 year olds are still having sex? didn't the article say she was artificially inseminated? so they didnt even do it... Link to post Share on other sites
fukdane 2 Posted January 16, 2004 Share Posted January 16, 2004 Bah! Link to post Share on other sites
veronica 2 Posted January 17, 2004 Share Posted January 17, 2004 Got to admit, I feel sorry for the kid what with no chance of knowing it's father and all sorts of other things. What about Orange-san's point Quote: ....if the bloke is 87 are his menfish doing the biz ok? Is there not some increased chance of there being problems with the baby??? Any biologists here? Link to post Share on other sites
Dims 0 Posted January 17, 2004 Share Posted January 17, 2004 You called! I am not 100% certain but I think there is a significantly higher chance of mutation in the sperm of an 87-old man. The cellular tissue that is producing sperm is getting on a bit and this leads to mistakes during DNA replication and chromosome allignment. Lots of science talk from me today. I'll shut up now and go boarding. Link to post Share on other sites
JonnyPanic 0 Posted January 18, 2004 Share Posted January 18, 2004 Making it irresponsible..... Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts