Kumapix 0 Posted May 7, 2006 Share Posted May 7, 2006 I thought we needed a thread to dump all our photography-related thoughts in. ie how to get the best colours when u post online, what camera/video gear you use on the mountain and tips & tricks. Unfortunately since the season is nearly over I think this thread will be soon lost to page 2 & beyond. Link to post Share on other sites
ianbc 0 Posted May 7, 2006 Share Posted May 7, 2006 as for your calibrating thoughts.... calibrating your monitor is a highly recommend idea if your aspirations are to make some money off images...I dont know much about it but nearly every pro does it .... and is very likely reason for your issues. as for this thread when it comes to print and web PS work I got some answers if ya need them.(not all but a few) Link to post Share on other sites
Kumapix 0 Posted May 8, 2006 Author Share Posted May 8, 2006 cool I was given some tips for snow action ie spotmetering and bumping exposure compensation up 1 but I don't think I'll be able to try it til next year Link to post Share on other sites
Kumapix 0 Posted September 10, 2006 Author Share Posted September 10, 2006 update: regarding the image problems I was having...after extensive editing, the pictures developped badly. The reason was that the photo shop (kitamura) lets their machine 'auto-correct' the photos. Contrast, brightness and sharpness are all done automatically. That sometimes cancels out or changes what you have done. You have to ask them to turn off the auto-correct. I also got a monitor calibrator, the spyder2 pro. It didn't change much, just that my monitor was way too bright apparently. Link to post Share on other sites
Kumapix 0 Posted September 10, 2006 Author Share Posted September 10, 2006 I am going to get a d80!! but I'm still not sure as to what lens to get. I still have a 70-300ed... I'm thinking of just getting a 50mm 1.8 off ebay and then maybe the vr 18-200. Not sure though. It doesn't seem that the 18-200 is good enough for pro photos...but I don't want to spend too much either! Link to post Share on other sites
bushpig 0 Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 they were autocorrecting? Shit, that sucks for people who go for deliberate effects eh! Good to know kuma The d80 looks sweet! Let us know how you like it. Link to post Share on other sites
Kumapix 0 Posted September 10, 2006 Author Share Posted September 10, 2006 in japanese it's hosei suru, in case people wanted to check at their local spots. not going to get the d80 for a couple of months though. Need the price to drop a man or 2 first. Link to post Share on other sites
NoFakie 45 Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 What kind of photos are you taking? I've got a sigma 1.4 30mm that I bought to take pictures of my baby daughter indoors. Its great in low light, of course, but boke is overpowering if open it up with a close subject outdoors. Under f2, the depth of focus for close subjects is also extreme, so you can get portraits where only one eye on a tilted face is in tight focus. There is very little margin for error. The vr supposedly gives you an extra few stops handheld. While that is impressive, for action snowpics, a longer exposure isn't going to freeze the action. You want a fast shutter. With the d80, you get ISO100, higher rez, and better AF. The only downside is that they'll release an even better one in two years time. Link to post Share on other sites
bushpig 0 Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by Mr Wiggles: With the d80, you get ISO100, higher rez, and better AF. The only downside is that they'll release an even better one in two years time. Too bloody true Mr W! Link to post Share on other sites
Kumapix 0 Posted September 10, 2006 Author Share Posted September 10, 2006 2 years is a long time though. How many pictures can u take in that time? for snow shots I use the 300mm lens, that way i can shoot face shots without getting one too other lens for everything else Link to post Share on other sites
bushpig 0 Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 Mate, in the two years I've had my d70, I've taken around 8000 pics! I'm sure a lot of photographers would take many more than that! Here are some pics I took back in Aus this summer: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bushpig77/sets/72157594277201228/ Link to post Share on other sites
Kumapix 0 Posted September 10, 2006 Author Share Posted September 10, 2006 i like the perth and the first sunset alot nice! Link to post Share on other sites
bushpig 0 Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 cheers kuma Link to post Share on other sites
eskimobasecamp 0 Posted September 11, 2006 Share Posted September 11, 2006 wow bushy amazing pics, love the bird ones very much. i'm looking for a good camera for the snow this winter, really want to take some time to get some amazing shots. what's the d70? what brand is that? Link to post Share on other sites
bushpig 0 Posted September 11, 2006 Share Posted September 11, 2006 thanks EBC Yeah, I like the bird ones more than the others actually. The d70 is a nikon. It's a digital slr. Pretty good camera. The Canon Eos kiss is pretty good too for the price. Link to post Share on other sites
Kumapix 0 Posted September 11, 2006 Author Share Posted September 11, 2006 i was looking at the Kiss for a friend but the body is such a piece of shit! EBC if you want a dslr get a Nikon d50. You'll get much better pictures than from a d70 and for cheaper. The only problem is that Nikon has stopped production on them but there's tons on yahoo auctions for 4 to 5man Link to post Share on other sites
woywoy 0 Posted September 11, 2006 Share Posted September 11, 2006 Kuma, you really think you get better pics from a D50 than D70? Link to post Share on other sites
bushpig 0 Posted September 11, 2006 Share Posted September 11, 2006 kuma, I don't really know much about the d50 other than that it was aimed at the lower end of the slr market, and I don't think it was available when I bought mine (??). Is there a such a marked difference between the two? Anyway, yeah the eos body isn't quite as sturdy. But, it is a lot more compact than the d70 (what about the d50??). As for second hand gear, you can get some great bargains but you can also get problems that aren't evident when buying. Slight glitches in the programming, processing, functionality. I personally am a bit hesitant to get second hand gear when it comes to camera gear. I think there was less risk with real old school cameras, but these days a lot can go wrong with them if you are unlucky. Link to post Share on other sites
Kumapix 0 Posted September 11, 2006 Author Share Posted September 11, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by NPM: Kuma, you really think you get better pics from a D50 than D70? you can better jpegs. just read any of the photography site reviews out there. The key is the updated sensor. It was also aimed at dslr beginners upgrading from point and shoots so it makes sense to have beautiful jpegs coming out with no effort. That's not to say that you can't get beautiful pics out of a d70 if you know what you're doing.d70 has been out a long time and the d70s really didn't change much. d50 is much smaller and lighter which is a good thing imo. Link to post Share on other sites
Kumapix 0 Posted September 11, 2006 Author Share Posted September 11, 2006 true bp about the 2nd hand. You're a bit safer buying 2nd hand from a place like kitamura which will give you a guarantee. Link to post Share on other sites
Kumapix 0 Posted September 11, 2006 Author Share Posted September 11, 2006 to save you looking up a photo review site, here's a paragraph from thom hogan (www.bythom.com) writing about the D80 What I think is interesting about the D80 is that it essentially replaces the D70s even though Nikon currently says it is an "addition to the lineup." Personally, I see no reason to buy a D70s any more. The D50 produces better JPEG images than the D70s at a lower price, and the D80 outfeatures the D70s in so many ways at not much more price that it becomes the new high-end amateur camera to get in the Nikon lineup (the D200 would be a prosumer camera; you really don't need anything in the D200 that the D80 doesn't have unless you have some specific higher-end need, like speed for sports shooting, use of older high-end manual focus lenses, etc.). That has implications. If I'm right and the D70s goes away, then look for the D50 to go away with the next consumer camera. In other words, within 12 months down the road I expect a D40 to replace the D50. Take a D80, remove some of the features (DOF preview, Func button, Front Command dial, multiple exposures, wired remote, optional battery grip, simplify the AF a bit more, slow it down by a fps or so) and put a renewed firmware emphasis on squeezing out some more JPEG quality and you've basically got a D40. Something else would have to give to get some more margin, so perhaps the shutter and/or viewfinder will simplify. But basically, a D40 would be to a D80 what a D50 was to a D70. Link to post Share on other sites
bushpig 0 Posted September 11, 2006 Share Posted September 11, 2006 yep, definitely. If you can get a warranty, then no hassles. Didn't know that about the d50. The d70 is due for retirement anyway soon. It was(is) a great camera when it was released, and still stacks up pretty damn well. Anyway, that d80 looks nice mate... Link to post Share on other sites
Kumapix 0 Posted September 11, 2006 Author Share Posted September 11, 2006 ken rockwell reviews the d50: http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d50.htm Link to post Share on other sites
eskimobasecamp 0 Posted September 11, 2006 Share Posted September 11, 2006 thanks guys good info Link to post Share on other sites
Kumapix 0 Posted September 11, 2006 Author Share Posted September 11, 2006 just don't get a silver one!! Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts