thursday 1 Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 greedy. Kids are gifts who keep giving. Link to post Share on other sites
Nisoko 6 Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Ah, you meant IRRESPONSIBLE. I see. Link to post Share on other sites
nagpants 1 Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 ....until they only start taking! Link to post Share on other sites
gareth_oau 2 Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Originally Posted By: thursday greedy. Kids are gifts who keep giving you headaches and financial problems . Link to post Share on other sites
@tokyo 14 Posted January 31, 2009 Share Posted January 31, 2009 Sounds like a complete nightmare to me. Link to post Share on other sites
pie-eater 207 Posted January 31, 2009 Share Posted January 31, 2009 A Californian woman who gave birth to octuplets earlier this week already has six children, US media has reported. The eight babies were delivered nine weeks early by Caesarean section in a hospital near Los Angeles on Monday. The mother has not been named, but US media is quoting family members as saying she already has six other children, including twins. Doctors say the eight babies are making good progress and are expected to stay in hospital for several more weeks. Link to post Share on other sites
thursday 1 Posted January 31, 2009 Share Posted January 31, 2009 cool. A complete Rugby team. Link to post Share on other sites
HelperElfMissy 42 Posted January 31, 2009 Share Posted January 31, 2009 Originally Posted By: pie-eater A Californian woman who gave birth to octuplets earlier this week already has six children, US media has reported. The eight babies were delivered nine weeks early by Caesarean section in a hospital near Los Angeles on Monday. The mother has not been named, but US media is quoting family members as saying she already has six other children, including twins. Doctors say the eight babies are making good progress and are expected to stay in hospital for several more weeks. OMG! Link to post Share on other sites
IIIII 2 Posted January 31, 2009 Share Posted January 31, 2009 The story gets better: It began as a feel-good story designed to lift America’s spirits during another week of grim economic news. But last night increasingly difficult questions were being asked about the birth on Monday of healthy octuplets – only the second known case in US medical history – after it emerged that the mother may have undergone fertility treatment, even though she already had six children. In vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment guidelines produced by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine say that a woman under 35 should have no more than two embryos implanted at a time. The organisation said last night that it had started an investigation into the case. Patients must also typically undergo a thorough evaluation before qualifying for IVF treatment. Link to post Share on other sites
rach 1 Posted January 31, 2009 Share Posted January 31, 2009 Surely no! Link to post Share on other sites
HelperElfMissy 42 Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Unless there are monozygotic twins in that bunch (identicals) then there were at least 8 viable embryo's implanted into this woman. A woman who already has 6 children. She is apparently quite young lives with her parents and hubby is back off to Iraq! According to reports I have read. Would not happen in Aus. There are strict guidelines as to WHO qualifies for IVF and you will not get it on a whim! And there are strict guidelines for numbers to be implanted as well. However I believe there are some dodgy fertility clinics in the US who routinely implant higher numbers of embryos so that thier 'success rates' are higher. In general, depsite an implantation of 8 embryos the likelyhood of a pregnancy with all 8 fetuses is low - but there are always exceptions - as these guys found out. I feel sad for the women with no kids in more ethical locales who have been refused treatment for one reason or another when they see this story - must make them real mad! Link to post Share on other sites
ShinyDiscoBall 2 Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 Nuts. Link to post Share on other sites
Hokkaidough 4 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 And here she is Link to post Share on other sites
grungy-gonads 54 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 And I was just about to have breakfast.... Link to post Share on other sites
thursday 1 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 that is indeed a big belly. Link to post Share on other sites
veronica 2 Posted February 15, 2009 Author Share Posted February 15, 2009 Yikes! Link to post Share on other sites
grungy-gonads 54 Posted February 16, 2009 Share Posted February 16, 2009 Fancy that v? Link to post Share on other sites
thursday 1 Posted February 16, 2009 Share Posted February 16, 2009 more clues Link to post Share on other sites
@tokyo 14 Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 Clues for what? Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted March 8, 2009 Share Posted March 8, 2009 I wonder if she can have 6 more breasts augmented on.. That would be pretty cool Link to post Share on other sites
grungy-gonads 54 Posted March 8, 2009 Share Posted March 8, 2009 The woman on Total Recall with 3 breasts was freaky. I think 2 perfectly formed is much more preferable. Link to post Share on other sites
thursday 1 Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 yeah, like I have three hands? Link to post Share on other sites
keba 0 Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 It gets better. Now there are reports she's been offered $1 million dollars to star for Vivid in a "celebrity porn" film. Family will get medical/dental care in the deal, apparently. Porn firm wants 'Octomom' in hardcore film Link to post Share on other sites
Error404 0 Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 Deary. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts