Wizz 11 Posted February 16, 2003 Share Posted February 16, 2003 Well let's pole it shall we... Link to post Share on other sites
DrMabuse 0 Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 NO! Link to post Share on other sites
grungy-gonads 54 Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 Seems to be a majority there then. Link to post Share on other sites
miteyak 0 Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 Lets clarify. Against a non-UN attack, but all for an 'international police force' sanctioned by the UN to go an arrest that SOB for all his crimes, using 'reasonable force' to do so. (yes, tactical nuclear devices Do fall outside reasonable force) Having said that, whilst they are in the area, there are a few other SOBs that need picking up for crimes against humanity. Link to post Share on other sites
veronica 2 Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 NO NO NO Link to post Share on other sites
r46 0 Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 Against. The US worries me almost as much as some of these other "bad guys". Link to post Share on other sites
pink 0 Posted February 20, 2003 Share Posted February 20, 2003 I hope no attack. Link to post Share on other sites
Fattwins 0 Posted February 21, 2003 Share Posted February 21, 2003 Who creates these sobs? I think we all know that. You cant claim to be the state that will get rid of WMDS, if you are the one making the majority of them. Link to post Share on other sites
Dokumanju 0 Posted February 21, 2003 Share Posted February 21, 2003 definately no and like miteyak has said, being anti war does not equal being pro saddam. and also, iraq does not equal al queda does not equal bin laden. in other words, if there was a way to oust saddam and his family out of power without bombing a starved country back into another stone age, yeh, that'd be nice. As to how tho, I wish i had a decent idea. Link to post Share on other sites
Weegeoff 0 Posted February 22, 2003 Share Posted February 22, 2003 It can only be NO NO NO. There is only one idiot with weapons of mass descruction sorry two Bush and Blair Link to post Share on other sites
yodel 0 Posted February 25, 2003 Share Posted February 25, 2003 Look at that - 4 for, 24 against. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts