Oyuki kigan 0 Posted June 17, 2008 Author Share Posted June 17, 2008 Originally Posted By: JA Doubt it, there was too much "independent" evidence, for example, from the occupants of the plane for there to be any mileage in a conspiracy theory in that direction. these people have got to concentrate their efforts in areas where ther can be some seeds of doubt sown, then irrigate these with plenty of mis (or dis)information. actually, there is plenty there that people question. Particularily, why the wreckage was spread over a huge area (as if it was blown up) instead of the wreckage you would expect to find at a crash. The pics of the supposed crash site show very little actual wreckage. Link to post Share on other sites
Curt 1 Posted June 24, 2008 Share Posted June 24, 2008 So did we come to a conclusion then? Link to post Share on other sites
Curt 1 Posted July 5, 2008 Share Posted July 5, 2008 9/11 third tower mystery 'solved' http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7485331.stm The final mystery of 9/11 will soon be solved, according to US experts investigating the collapse of the third tower at the World Trade Center. The 47-storey third tower, known as Tower Seven, collapsed seven hours after the twin towers. Investigators are expected to say ordinary fires on several different floors caused the collapse. Conspiracy theorists have argued that the third tower was brought down in a controlled demolition. Unlike the twin towers, Tower Seven was not hit by a plane. The National Institute of Standards and Technology, based near Washington DC, is expected to conclude in its long-awaited report this month that ordinary fires caused the building to collapse. That would make it the first and only steel skyscraper in the world to collapse because of fire. .... what you reckon spacefrog? Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts