Jump to content

Kingofmyrrh

SnowJapan Member
  • Content Count

    470
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by Kingofmyrrh

  1.  Originally Posted By: skidaisuki
    You were spot on with your prediction. Was at Kagura for the day on Sunday and I have never seen it so busy. Had to queue for 10+ minutes for the quad at Tashiro... arghhh.



    The skin track up from the top quad was more like a skin highway... there were a lot of guided tours up there, must have passed close to 25 people on my way up. Fortunately there seemed to be relatively few people venturing past the top of the No 5 Romance... seems crazy skinning all the way up to the top of a lift that will open in less than a month, but each to their own I guess.
  2.  Originally Posted By: muikabochi
    It's not actually just above the runs there is a dip between that peak (Iiji-san) and the resort. Having said that in the few times I have been to Iwappara I've never seen anyone going up there!

    I'm afraid to say I bottled it and went to Kagura after all. Since I was on my own I knew I'd end up getting discouraged if I went for an explore on my won and didn't end up finding anything pleasing. Was out of bed at 5:10 and at the top of Mitsumata ropeway by 8:10. That is a pretty decent turnaround for a train user, even if I do say so myself. Hiked up to the peak a total of three times but 2/3 was beaten back by near-whiteout conditions. Didn't get quite as far around as I wanted to even on the successful effort, but still enjoyed it. Was all a bit low angle though, maybe I just didn't hit the right line (I couldn't really see well enough to plan out in detail). Met a couple of British guys with a North American fellow towards the end of the day - the North American guy was planning to camp out underneath the No 5 Romance lift top station, braver man than I!

    And I saw a big white mountain hare, never seen one before, that was probably my favourite bit!
  3. Thanks for the maps. Clearly most of the resorts you mention are no further from the station than Kagura really.

     

    Just because I am slightly lost for what to do it's almost tempting to go to Iwappara and say hello to the peak in your Maiko report. But I have no terrain map and on the Iwappara course map from the resort webpage it almost looks like it is directly above some of the resort runs, which is not exactly encouraging from a safety perspective.

  4. Thanks, I will have a check. I have been reading your reports but my grasp on the geography is a little weak. Of the ones you mention, I have been to Naeba before and didn't like it so much - and surely it will be pretty crowded this weekend? Anyway, will have a think.

     

    I think we've lost sight of the point of this thread - hating on Samurai for being so lucky! ;\)

  5.  Originally Posted By: samurai
    I'll be linking those gay double chairs that nobody rides because the courses are so short... ducking into sluffable trees, deep into the mysteries of zao. Nobody will know I'm there, and I won't cross a track. I'll score 12-16 virgin lines around 700-1000 vert (not huge, but defintely worthy). Then, I'll ski down to the base and wonder where all the people came from. \:\)


    Twist the knife why don't you!!
  6.  Originally Posted By: timcraig
    Tesselator I think you have your wires crossed. I am pretty sure Fat Twins has not been directing his responses at you for the most part. In this forum it is easy to put in a new post by clicking reply to the last post. I think this is what FT has done a few times and you have taken it as meaning that his remarks were purposefully directed at you.
    For example the comments about going into surf threads and commenting were actually directed at Indo, but because you had posted after Indo had and this moved the forum on to a new page it was easier to simply click reply to your message than go back and reply to Indo's. So although the post title said it was a reply to you it really wasn't. Get it?? For the most part the title saying who someone is replying to is incorrect as everyone really just replies to the last post regardless. I think this has been a bit confusing for you and made you feel the remarks were directed at you.

    Oh... beaten to the mark...
  7.  Originally Posted By: Tesselator
     Originally Posted By: Fattwins

    A quote from Mamabear that is stupid!


    Yes, you ARE on drugs. The info is in and the jury is out. \:D

    No one said anything about the word "idiot". Who are you having this conversation with?
    I mean is says in the header that it's a reply to me (or I would just be watching and laughing
    at you) but your comments if they are in reply to me, DO NOT make any sense - at all.

    Now, don't get me wrong. I don't want to say you're bad or anything like that but I seriously
    think you need help. Either that or your browser is busted. Or mine is... crazy.gif


    The reason it says to you in the header of FT's surf post is merely because you were the last poster in the thread when FT pressed "reply". You'll see that Kumapix actually comes between you and FT, but if you check the post times of Kumapix and FT they are close together, meaning that at the actual time of pressing the reply button you would have been the latest post. Not only that, but in his reply FT specifically mentions Indo by name as the person he is addressing. I have no interest in the argument at all but accusing poeple of being on drugs because you don't have a firm grip on how ze interweb works (not that there's anything wrong with that) is a little strong for me.

    As you were.
×
×
  • Create New...