Jump to content

Ocean11

SnowJapan Member
  • Content Count

    9708
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ocean11

  1. > I guess I am prejudiced, then we probably all are to some degree.

     

    That's not quite what I meant. I meant that the language you used suggests something beyond what the original speaker said, so by interpreting what he said without sufficient reason, you prejudiced the terms of subsequent discussion.

     

    Reading Harris does rather tend to encourage a tendency towards militant anti-religiosity.

  2. You could supplement the Dawkins with The End of Faith by Sam Harris.

     

    I don't agree that he's calling for the 'destruction' of Israel, which suggests killing its inhabitants. For somebody who is discussing sensitivity to language, yours is also quite prejudicial. The solution which he proposes is not unreasonable on the face of it, and it's the one most likely to happen in the end (whenever that is). You know that people are now leaving Israel because they can't stand it any more... I'd listen to your friend if I were you.

  3. Rag-Doll, there's no disingenuousness involved. On the contrary, that take is an example of ignorance and prejudice of Westerners.

     

    In the Islamic world, one can talk about the Zionist Entity and the regime occupying Al-Qods without actually including all Jews. Palestine used to be a region where Arabs and Jews mixed - and it's only through savage ethnic cleaning that that situation is being undone. What Ahmadinejad and before him Khomeini were talking about was undoing the state of apartheid in Palestine. States and regimes are different from peoples, and again, it is crass Westerners who are stupid enough to constantly conflate them all.

     

    There are plenty of Jews who would be happy to see Israel be wiped off the map and the Zionist Entity forgotten.

     

    I'm not a big fan of Islam or indeed any other religion, and I don't approve of the way people like Hilaly express themselves. But I don't think it dignifies us in the West to play completely stupid either.

  4. My domain and business website is hosted by a company in the US at the moment and it's very cheap - about $40 a year, if that. But the mail provided is flaky, and they have zero support.

     

    So I checked out KDDI and their cheapest hosting deal is 3,200 yen per month - a much bigger hit.

     

    Can anybody recommend a good hosting service, either in Japan or overseas, that's cheaper than KDDI?

     

    Thanks.

  5. > Rock Lobster

    - The B-52's

     

    Trouble is with that, once you're committed, you're in for the long haul. When you're racking your brains for the right gesture to go with 'there goes a narwhal', it begins to feel like a life sentence. 'Tiger Feet' often proves regrettably irrestible in the same way.

     

    I find 'Good Thing Going' by Sugar Minott very enticing, but you don't hear it much.

  6. Not at all. The crux of the matter for any civilized behaviour is learning to strike a balance between provocation and response. More civilization tends to accumulate when people try not to provoke wantonly and try not to respond wantonly. The good Mufti was addressing one part of the equation, and most people are simply too prejudiced or stupid to understand what he said.

  7.  Quote:
    Originally posted by soubriquet:
    It seems fairly clear from the quote that he considers women who leave the home to be fair prey. Possibly also women who leave their rooms without wearing a hijab.
    You're committing a logical fallacy. What he says is strictly true. The opposite of what he says is not automatically open to the interpretation you and everybody else have supplied.

    It's rather shocking that such gross ignorance of rhetoric and logic should be the impetus behind immigration policy and blanket condemnations from the prime ministers of enlightened countries...
  8. Ah, it's good to see the actual quote rather than reports of the quote (which in the case of Muslims are often lies and distortions. The Prez of Iran hasn't called for Israel to be wiped off the map either...)

     

    It's obviously a loose metaphor, not a precise analogy, so to understand it as 'immodestly dressed women are meat whom men can innocently rape' is plain stupid. Maybe Islamic discourse isn't as dumbed down and coarse as ours has become, so Muslims can understand that it's not a highly categorical statement.

     

    So let's put it in perspective. The Mufti makes a statement about the risks of immodesty for Muslims. Then white women flock half naked to his mosque 'in protest'. Is it any wonder that Muslim men might start thinking that some white women are so stupid and insensitive and morally depraved that they might not even notice if they were raped?

     

    (I think we Westerners need to look back at our own countries only 50 years ago before we start pointing fingers at 'medieval Muslims'. In my neighbourhood even 25 years ago, most of the women wore scarves to go out and wouldn't dream of sunbathing in the garden lest people (men) see them.)

  9. There's a bit more info about the details of the matter here .

     

     Quote:
    The wife of the former Guantanamo Bay detainee, Mamdouh Habib, says she was present when Sheik Al Hilaly gave the controversial sermon last month. Maha Habib says there was nothing wrong with the sermon. "I have heard the speech that he has said," she said. "I have heard his words and I can understand and assure you the way I understood it that he wasn't talking to the Western people, he was lecturing us and telling us our duty towards being a Muslim and what is said in the Koran."
    It rather reminds me of the Pope getting stick for lecturing people, faithful or not, about the bits of the Bible they'd prefer to ignore. It seems reasonable for a religious community to address the issue of modesty in its own way, especially if it doesn't impinge on anybody else. To say that he is condoning rape is ridiculous, and dishonest.

     

    Instead of trying to deport this old bloke, they'd do better mounting a critique of his views, if indeed a coherent critique can be made.

  10.  Quote:
    Originally posted by veronica:
    I feel sorry for a few girls at our place who eat almost nothing and drink even less... but still pay the same as Mr Kacho who drinks and eats like a pig non stpp for 3 hours.
    That's pretty harsh vron. Mr Kacho is only doing what he's supposed to - leading by example and doing his best to create the right atmosphere. And perhaps Mr Kacho has more, and worst stuff to forget than Miss OL. Have a heart.
  11. Vivaldi.

     

    "Winter, Allegro non molto" is renaissance high-energy groove. It would make a fantastic soundtrack to a short snowboarding video, especially if the rockin' bits were extended slightly.

     

    The opening bit where you're putting your boots on and slithering to the lifts sounds really cold and wintery but with that building excitement.

     

    It even ends with the chattering of braking snowboards as a crew of increasingly fat gaijin haul up at the gondola again.

  12. rach, what's a quabble? Is it like a really bad quibble with a quarrel and a squabble?

     

    And, feel free, let your total lack of browser sophistication just hang right out in these threads. ;\)

     

    (Hint: You browser is probably the software you use the most, and being able to hide stuff you don't want to see, arranging topics and articles you want to read, and flipping between them with key commands is very nice. That's why folks use Firefox and Opera... For example, I chose to hide your 'ham' avatar because it always made me hungry - you can't do that in IE.)

×
×
  • Create New...