Jump to content

Ocean11

SnowJapan Member
  • Content Count

    9708
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ocean11

  1. No, I'm not going to explain it for you. You're too lazy to find out for yourself.

     

    You've allowed yourself to get your knickers in a sweaty bunch because of Asian English naming practices. (Today I got a Christmas card from my local antique shop, Antiques Vulvora. I guess their antiques can't be any good).

     

    Oyuki, this site has all the info in a much more easily comprehensible format. People who don't have a clue could probably learn something too.

  2. Actually I met the manufacturers at an environmental product trade show, saw the product demonstrated, heard the engineers explain how it works, listened to other engineers question them about it, checked reviews on the internet tubes, then finally concluded, well jeez, the price compares very favourably with the price of a few tanks of petrol, I'll happily fork over the money even for a trivial improvement.

     

    I don't seriously pontificate about things I know SFA about because it so frequently ends in embarrassment.

     

    Oh, and I'm sure one of the petrol heads on here will be happy to confirm that air intake plays a crucial role in engine performance - the holes aren't just for decoration.

  3.  Quote:
    Originally posted by skidaisuki:
    Ocean11 - where was I criticizing anyone's manners?
     Quote:
    6702 posts and you don't seem to have learned any manners.
    Had you perhaps forgotten already?

    You're talking there about/to somebody who has posted 47 km of worthwhile information about snow sports, while you feel free to post stuff that is not only ignorant and uninformed, it doesn't even pass the common sense test. It's not about manners, it's about information. I hope I won't have to mention this painful subject again.
  4. There's no point in telling some people about online dictionaries that they can use instead of lamely asking "What does ## mean?" (even though they start a thread about kanji). Some people are just too lazy to bookmark the dictionaries we post, and don't have the manners to contribute in any but the most lackadaisical fashion (and then turn around and pile on anybody who they think is 'disloyal to the forum' or some such drivel.) This is going to be a bit of a theme of mine for a while. Sorry if you don't like it.

  5. You're so cruel Creek Boy.

     

    But unfortunately not 牛飲馬食. Although the invitations come fast and furious, none of them are sincere, apparently.

     

    I was amazed that the 2nd choice of kanji was that imperial nipper's name. Are the Japanese people really that keen on this imperial folly, or is it just the type of person that submit 'this year's kanji'.

  6. That's a really bad choice of marketing term.

    First of all, it's so (off-puttingly) American. And I still don't really know what it means having looked it up, and I can't readily apply it to Japan either.

     

    Being in a 'downtown' doesn't sound like a major recommendation for outdoor sports either.

     

    And that "STILL" really begs the question "OK. Why?"

     

    Y'all can PM me for an estimate for proofing and assessment of your 'Hakuba Eldorado' copywriting efforts.

  7. Curt kicked things off with means of recovering from global warming so nuclear wouldn't count, strictly speaking. But I just read a suggestion on another forum today that building more fast reactors would be a good way of generating electricity and dealing with nuclear waste at the same time. But I don't know enough about that to comment. Apparently, in the US at least, there's already enough excess power generation to cover at least 84% of transport needs , if plug-in vehicles became the norm. The same probably applies elsewhere too. In Japan, there are at least two EVs scheduled for release within 2 years, so your suggestion may be realized anyway.

     

    Most of the 'sulphur in the sky' and 'big white reflector' schemes are ridiculous. They're just big, expensive, state-driven, reckless kludges that have no other purpose. They're not inherently sustainable. Instead of these, investing in a full-scale forestry industry would go a long way to solving the CO2 and many other problems, including water resources, employment, food and energy security, and health. Using forest thinnings in local cogeneration plants would provide heating and electricity. Using wood for building instead of concrete would lock up carbon for periods of between 50~100 years giving us a grace period to stop emitting more. And we could start today.

×
×
  • Create New...