Jump to content

SantaCruz

SnowJapan Member
  • Content Count

    378
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by SantaCruz

  1. The prices on the Evo website do not include any sales tax. The amount of sales tax varies from state and even on the county and city level. But the nice thing is that there's 0% sales tax for online purchases from sites which are headquartered in a different state.

    Like when I put a Hovercraft on order from some place based in Minnesota I paid no sales tax which was awesome. The lame aspect of this for me is that Amazon and REI are both based in Washington state, so I have to pay sales tax for any purchases there. I have no idea how this all translates to international purchases though, so all this info is probably worthless for you guys :)

     

    Now something that may help: Evo is actually local to me since I'm in Seattle. I was there a few weeks ago with my girl as she was looking at some skis. I'd be happy to help you guys however I can in terms of purchasing on your behalf and shipping it. Keep in mind that there would be a about 9.5% sales tax for the purchase though, so I'm not sure if it'd end up being a net win or not.

  2. I have a pair of Flows, they're about 4 or 5 years old now. What I love about them is that once you get the fit dialed in you don't have to mess around with it anymore. And in my experience it's been the snuggest/most firm fit I've ever had from the bindings I've tried. My boot is really locked in.

     

    The negatives are the release in powder and deep snow. I've ran across that many times and it's very frustrating. But I think the models now a days have ratchets in addition to the snappable high back. I'd imagine that this should solve that problem.

     

    Slightly OT but I just ordered a pair of Burton C60s for $280 USD. I thought this was a great deal until my friend told me that he got them at the end of last season for $140! Crazy deal.

  3. I posted on Jones Snowboards FB: "Leaning heavily towards picking up a Jones board this next season. I've narrowed it down to either a Flagship 168W or Hovercraft 160. Could anyone advise me about which would work better for a guy my size? 6ft 5in, 220, size 14 boot.

    Cheers."

     

    They replied: "Hard call James. The both work well in everything but if I could only pick one board it would be a Flagship. It is the most versatile snowboard I have ever ridden. Hope that helps. Jeremy"

     

    Direct reply from Jeremy? biggrin

  4. The 2012 Hovercraft will come in 160 as well. The impression that I've gotten is that it runs shorter compared to other boards. But still, I feel ya on the length thing. I'm trying to decide between Flagship 168W or Hovercraft 160. 8cms is a big diff!

     

    I've heard that Jones Snowboards are pretty responsive if you ping them on their FB page, so maybe it's worth asking them if the 160 would work for you.

  5. Yep I do work at Microsoft.

     

    I'm not surprised that more icons (dirs, files and shortcuts) would cause it to slow down. What I am surprised by is that having a large file on the desktop causes it to slow down.

     

    For instance, having 50 small jpegs (< 1KB) compared to having 50 large ones (>= 100MB).

     

    The only reason I could see this being different are for file types whose icons reflect their contents. For instance thumbnails for photos.

     

    I haven't tried it myself, but I'm not disputing that it works or doesn't. A quick search on the net finds many people with similar a similar experience so it seems to be commonly reported. Although I would be surprised if the files were loaded in their entirety. Then again software has done crazier things.

     

    Anyways, if it's true that's a terrible user experience. People shouldn't have to worry too much about that.

     

    Oh wells =(

  6. Originally Posted By: JA
    Actually, any FILES on the desktop are gonna slow the startup significantly, as tghe 'puter has to load the entire file every startup. Far better to have shortcuts to the necessary files on the desktop.


    I've never heard of this before and I'm surprised that this makes a difference. The desktop is just a folder whose contents happen to be displayed.

    If it's a fairly recent system (last few years) the it has more than enough RAM and CPU to handle it and the perf difference should be non-existent or imperceptible. It is true that it needs to create resources to display each icon on the desktop but this has nothing to do with the contents of the file.

    I'm very curious now why this speeds things up.
×
×
  • Create New...