Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

Just took a look at the trailer at the website. They really are keeping quiet.

 

That bridge at the beginning looks like Runcorn bridge. I never knew they were filming in exotic Runcorn. lol.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

And....

 

Hi, Harry.

 

The reason I'm writing you is that I saw War of the Worlds last Wednesday. It was a special screening and I was a guest.

 

Just a few words about the movie. Being the huge Spielberg fan I am, I really believe that, since that masterpiece called A.I., he's been proving that he is in one of the best periods of his career: Minority Report kicked ass, Catch Me If You Can was just wonderful and The Terminal is one of his most underrated movies.

 

War of the Worlds is not less good than all those movies.

 

The action sets in 12 minutes into the movie and, from that point on, it never stops. But it's NOT the typical blockbuster movie like, let's say, Independence Day, The Day After Tomorrow or Crap Helsing. We never see the destruction of any major city or landmarks: everything we see is through Tom Cruise, Dakota Fanning or Justin Chatwin's eyes. There's no hero that saves the day. And the real terror doesn't come from those amazing tripods (or the aliens inside them: yes, we see them at some point!): it comes from the humans. There's an incredible lynching scene that left me speechless. And there's another scene where one character is killed that goes beyond anything we've seen in a Summer movie (while watching it I was thinking: He's not gonna do it, Spielberg, won't do it... And he does it).

 

Beyond all that, the movie has a few shots that will stay with me forever: Dakota Fanning looking at a river covered with tens of bodies, so many we don't see the water; Cruise and Tim Robbins' faces covered with blood that falls from the skies; a train in flames crossing in front of a bunch of survivors; the facade of a church separating from the rest of it and threatening people around it; the remains of a plane crash... Yes, War of the Worlds has lots of action: it's like Jurassic Park, without all the bad dialogue; and amazing set-pieces: the first attack in New Jersey, another attack to a ferry that recalls Titanic, the sequence in the basement, that could be described as Jurassic Park meets Signs... But it's mostly the story of a father willing to do anything, and by anything I really mean ANYTHING, to save the lives of those he cares about. I'm afraid the Summer audience will be kind of disappointed, because it's more than just a Summer blockbuster. But I think we should thank Spielberg for reinventing the Summer blockbuster. Again.

 

Call me SpongeMan, if you post this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

About the books

 

 Quote:
In each case, Wells uses the trappings of science-fiction and popular literature to lure readers into what is essentially a moral lesson. THE TIME MACHINE is essentially a statement on the evils of the English class system. THE INVISIBLE MAN addresses the predicaments of the men and women to whom society turns a blind eye. And THE WAR OF THE WORLDS is a truly savage commentary on British imperialism and colonialism.
I never knew there was more to them than the stories. It sounds like they're all worth a read. With the current political climate though, this allegorical aspect of WOTW seems ripe for a convenient Hollywood-style "realignment".
Link to post
Share on other sites

Been reading a few other reviews as well, they do seem to be generally positive about it which is interesting. Says it's not an ID style "blow up the white house and other famous places" shootout, but more following the story of one family and how they see it.

 

I still haven't seen a tripod yet though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And here is another (maybe spoilers):

 

'I attended the screening of the movie in Marseilles, and I would like to start off by commenting on how much this movie surprised me. I had heard a lot of talk about how personal the story would be, but I was not expecting it to be such a damn tragedy. The movie starts off with Cruise getting his kids from ex-wife. It is established almost immediately that he is a rather shitty fellow, through his mannerisms and the way he acts towards his friends and family. His attitude is the biggest problem - he is arrogant, but it's not the Tom Cruise arrogance that we've come to know. It's a different kind of arrogance, one seemingly routed in the fact that he still hasn't accepted the blame for the ruin of his marriage.

 

The exposition is very quick, lasting approximately twelve or thirteen minutes. The action ramps up exponentially at this point, dumping the audience directly in the middle of the start of the war. I will try to refrain from major spoilers, but let me tell that the tripods, which have only been hinted at in the trailers and advertisements, look very, very nice. The fact that the scenes featuring them clearly were not shot against a blue screen add to the astounding achievement by ILM here. They look positively real - blended and contrasted perfectly amongst the real-world light, shadows, and dust.

 

This movie is very different when it comes to big action sequences - the camera stays below and/or between the characters and the antagonists. It would also appear that at some points Spielberg used a hand-held camera, because I was reminded of Omaha Beach. One scene in particular, immediately following the emergence of the tripod, is so absolutely intense that you wonder how it could not be a documentary. Perhaps Spielberg's wisest choice in these scenes was to actually let the extras compliment the major actors, rather than just focusing on the recognizable faces. That is not to say that they are not almost always prominent, but it is awesome to see Cruise's reaction amongst about 150 other literally 'devolving' citizens. The panic and hysteria has taken over them all - they trample and kick and punch like nothing that I've ever seen before.

 

I am actually very surprised that this movie is PG-13.

 

There are four scenes in particular that make me question how they got this, because they are something that I never expected to see. One of these starts off beautifully, with Dakota going down to the riverfront.

 

The scene has an almost surreal feel - it seems as if Spielberg used filters here to bring out the glowing quality of the sun. Then, without warning, a corpse flows in front of her, following the river's current. This is followed by more, and then even more, until the whole river is covered with bodies. The camera cuts to Dakota - she has such a look of disbelief and incomprehension - ah, it broke my heart. There are three other such scenes that really took my breath away at how awful yet beautiful they were.

 

The acting was also more than I was expecting. The aforementioned Dakota Fanning proves why she is the go to girl currently. She adds a complexity to her role that is seldom seen amongst child stars. Rather than just acting off of Tom Cruise and reacting to him, it would see as if she actually inhabited her character and gave it its own personal qualities and pathos. Tom Cruise also did well, showing us that he can portray other things that his well-known personality. The scenes with him and Dakota (one in particular after the departure of another character) are absolutely breathtaking. I literally was on the verge of tears in one of them.

 

I think that Spielberg has a big hit on his hands here. Because of the apparent press blanket, there hasn't really been that much early hype, but I'm positive that this will change after the release. The film will undoubtedly benefit from excellent word of mouth, because, simply put, it is stunning.'

Link to post
Share on other sites

> Perhaps Spielberg's wisest choice in these scenes was to actually let the extras compliment the major actors

 

"Tom, you have a very handsome nose."

"Yes, and Tim, you may not be as pretty as Tom but you have charisma, you really do."

"Dakota is such a pretty name."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know who Clint is? Well, this is a review I have just been sent (by one of my Spielberg/Xfile/Alien-loving friends.

 

--

 

Ahoy, squirts! Quint here, back in my hotel room after a whirlwind night in New York City. I've put up my spiffy clothes (including the first shirt I ever paid more than $20 for) and am ready to write up my opinion of Steven Spielberg's WAR OF THE WORLDS. I got to attend the NY premiere this very night and am here to tell you about the flick. I'm not going to delve very deeply into spoilers, but there may be some stuff below that you don't want to know if you want to keep spoiler-free for the film.

I had been worried about WAR OF THE WORLDS. Nothing I saw onset gave me a hint at which way the movie was going. I had friends who were on the inside that told me David Koepp's script was fantastic and I have a ton of faith in Spielberg, so I was hoping for the best. Then the reviews started coming in saying that the movie was great up until you meet Tim Robbin's character, then it just runs out of steam and loses its focus. Not all the reviews said that, but more than one felt that was a problem.

So, I was hoping they were wrong going into the screening, but also thinking that it was a possibility. Spielberg's done uneven stuff before. So, what's the verdict?

In short, Spielberg knocked it out of the park.

I'm so glad he kept the key imagery out of the marketing. It was so nice to see a big summer event film on the big screen and not feel like I'm just waiting for the bits in-between the sequences from the trailer and other marketing.

I was worried a little about Tom Cruise in the film. Not because of all this bullshit that has been going on in the last couple of months, but the worry was that Cruise playing the lead would make his character an action hero, not an average person. However, Cruise's character is very real and he plays it very real. Flawed, even. Matter of fact, Ray is kind of an asshole. He doesn't know how to be a father, so when he takes his two kids (Dakota Fanning and Justin Chatwin) from his ex and her husband for the weekend it comes off very uncomfortable.

His ex doesn't trust him, his kids treat him like a stranger and every move he makes to share some quality time is forced. All this is shown in about 10 minutes of the film. It's not long before the shit goes down and once it starts it doesn't stop.

I'm going to say right here and now that the sequence where the first tripod is revealed is one of the best directed, paced, shot and performed sequences ever put to film. Pretty high praise, I know, but it's it true. From the moment Tom Cruise arrives at the spot where all the lightning was striking to the moment he walks back through his door... classic scene. The tripods are massive, hardcore and vicious. Everything we wanted them to be.

Spielberg shot them throughout the whole movie with a sense of mystery and awe. There's a running theme of mirrors and reflections in the film that is used to great effect. Don't get me wrong... there is still a ton of spectacle and some epic shots, but there's a freshness to the film that I haven't felt from Spielberg in a long time. I loved CATCH ME IF YOU CAN and THE TERMINAL mostly for the character work done by the actors (Hanks in both and Walken in CATCH ME) however I didn't get a sense of them as Spielberg movies.

WAR OF THE WORLDS is a Steven Spielberg movie. You feel it in every shot, every performance and every sound. Even before the invasion starts, the camerawork is sharp and creative, keeping an energy to the film, a momentum that builds to the arrival of the aliens. One of the reasons I love JAWS is his creativity with the editing, the camera work and the angles he chose. His recent films haven't looked dull, but this is the first time since SAVING PRIVATE RYAN that I could almost see Spielberg's face on the screen, he's put that much of himself into the film.

The film is rated PG-13 and it's a hard PG-13. Some swearing at the beginning... no big deal... But when the Tripods start blasting people... when you see how they create the red weed... Good God, it was awesome. And that's not taking into account the intensity. During the scene I was talking about earlier, the reveal of the first Tripod... I was wondering why the audience was so quiet until I looked down my row and literally every single person in my row (middle aged men, teenage girls, etc) was staring at the screen, mouths hanging open. They were awed. I haven't seen a film do that in a while.

Without ruining the surprise, I will say that Spielberg came up with a great way to show the Tripods taking out dozens upon dozens of people... a great visual that signals it has happened even if we don't see it (and we do see a lot of people get taken out, so don't think they use this as a way to not deliver the goods).

The effects are stunning, of course. ILM can be iffy these days, depending on the project, but whenever they're working under Spielberg they always seem to be at the top of their game and WAR OF THE WORLDS is no exception. The Tripods are massive and awesome, the aliens (yes, you do get to see the aliens) are creepy and oddly built. They move unlike most aliens I've seen put to screen, although there is a bit that reminded me of ET in their big scene, but, again, I'll let you discover the details of that your own self.

And yes, they are aliens, not some alternate dimensional ogres or whatever the hell people thought they were going to be. They managed not to lie in their advertising ("They're already here"), but still kept them aliens from another planet. I will say no more.

When I was onset, Spielberg told me he was keeping the film almost solely from the perspective of the family we're following and he wasn't lying. You stick with Ray Ferrier and his kids through it all. As their story weaves in and out of the line of fire we see glimpses of how the rest of the world is affected and we learn a little about the aliens in their encounters with other survivors. The military is seen only briefly, only as Ray and his family come into contact with them, so you don't have big scenes of jets shooting at Tripods until Ray and his family are there. This decision is a brilliant way to exclude any similarity between Spielberg's alien invasion film and Emmerich's. WAR OF THE WORLDS is unique, but still thrilling which is why I anticipate this to be a big hit. The draw will be Spielberg and Cruise, but what'll keep people coming back is how they made the flick.

The acting is top notch all across the board. Cruise hits every beat just right and I'm hoping all this tabloid bullshit that's been surrounding him lately will be forgotten about once the film begins. I know it all slipped my mind and Cruise and Holmes were in the theater with me, supposedly. I never saw them once, but I'm told they were there.

Dakota Fanning proves again that she is deserving of my shocked terror every time I see her on screen or off. She's extremely good in the film, too good. She's like a midget or a realistic android... She's just not right. Her talent, her maturity... all belong to someone much older than she. People keep comparing her to Jodie Foster and I don't disagree.

Tim Robbins is cool in the movie, playing a kookie guy that helps Cruise and his family out at an opportune moment. He has a terrific scene with Cruise, played mostly silent with facial expressions and hand gestures... another highlight moment of the film.

I didn't feel the movie lose focus or become something it shouldn't have been from this point, like I was worried I was. I think it's a bit of a shock to some people because this is the first time the movie lets you take a breath, the first time it slows down at all. I think it's a much needed moment, especially when you see what happens just previous to it. But the breather doesn't last very long...

Justin Chatwin plays Cruise's son. Like his dad, he's a bit of an asshole at first, but the compassion he has for his sister (Fanning) goes a long way to making him sympathetic for the audience. Chatwin does a solid job with the character. He's comfortable in front of the camera and it's a good thing, too, because this is probably the least likable character in the film and if Chatwin hadn't been up to snuff he could have really made the character a bore. I hear he's great in CHUMSCRUBBER. He's definitely one to keep an eye on.

Morgan Freeman's opening and closing narration is perfect. Freeman doing Welles reading Wells. Freeman's the man.

John Williams' score is nice, but non-intrusive. Lots of horns and drums... a little James Horner-y. I would have loved an instantly recognizable theme for the titles, but I can't complain. His music fit the film like a glove, but wasn't too showy.

I don't know if I have anything else to say... I know the ending (**SLIGHT SPOILERS HERE**) has been worried about, but I thought it was a nice cap to the film. The cynics will no doubt be bitching about it being too happy and I thought I was going to feel that way, too, but when the ending came it didn't feel out of place or unearned.(**END SLIGHT SPOILERS**)

So, rejoice! This summer is still running strong. We have a great BATMAN movie in theaters already, a sweet Romero zombie movie opening this weekend and a great Spielberg sci-fi blockbuster opening next week. If Spielberg can bring this level of effortless creativity to INDIANA JONES 4, then I say bring on INDIANA JONES 4!

I'm tired... it's been a helluva long day... I saw a movie in the same room as Hulk Hogan, Bruce Willis, Bill O'Reilly (believe it or not), Tim Robbins, Susan Sarandon (how that couple could have been in the same room as O'Reilly and not start a fist-fight is a minor miracle), Paul Schrader, Peter Bogdanovich, Howard Stern, Ice T and John Singleton and the main cast and crew of WOTW to name a few... that's so weird... and I got to tell Tim Robbins that I loved him in HOWARD THE DUCK (no lie) and Kate Capshaw that I am one of the few people that can honestly and with total sincerity tell her that I love TEMPLE OF DOOM. I also got to geek out in front of Dennis Murren for a few minutes. As you can see, it's been a wild ride and I'm happy to share it with you folks.

I have a day of enjoying the city in front of me tomorrow... so I better get to bed before I sleep the whole day away. I've got some cool shit on the horizon, squirts, including a set visit to a sci-fi/horror flick called ALTERED, my time up north on the set of MASTERS OF HORROR as well as those KONG reports to finish up, not to mention Comic-Con happening in about 3 weeks. Busy busy busy. 'Til then, this is Quint bidding you all a fond farewell and adieu.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A friend of mine over in the States saw it last night and said he was very surprised. I think he was expecting to be able to knock it, but he seemed impressed. It's looking good actually, really looking forward to seeing this. One thing is for sure, they have done an excellent job in keeping story/aliens leaking before the movie is released.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well well well, I may have to eat my words here.....

 

Will still have to suspend my dislike for Mr. Cruise but I will give it a go. A bit relived the movie sounds as it has a dark side. A bit of a suprise this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm, once we step away from the gushing fan-boys those last few reviews have a sense of a bit more realism about them. I think I will still go and check it out at the cinema. Looking forward to seeing the aliens in action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...