damian 0 Posted August 3, 2006 Share Posted August 3, 2006 The only thing lamer than this entry is the accompanying picture. Something should be done about it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Alps Link to post Share on other sites
SnowJapan.Com#2 0 Posted August 3, 2006 Share Posted August 3, 2006 If anyone does anything about it, give us a mention will you Link to post Share on other sites
damian 0 Posted August 3, 2006 Author Share Posted August 3, 2006 check it out, the last line, you owe me. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_Alps Link to post Share on other sites
SnowJapan.Com#2 0 Posted August 3, 2006 Share Posted August 3, 2006 The last line? Sorry, I'm really not well up on these things at all - it looked the same as before when I looked again, but if you mentioned us - big thanks! Link to post Share on other sites
damian 0 Posted August 3, 2006 Author Share Posted August 3, 2006 I said "sj.com was a great website" but the moderator deleted it in les than a few minutes. He obviously hates SJ. This is the page history http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Japanese_Alps&oldid=67291438 Link to post Share on other sites
tsondaboy 0 Posted August 3, 2006 Share Posted August 3, 2006 The info about J-alps is also inaccurate. The highest pick in Japan after Fuji is Kita-dake (3193 m) in the southern Japanese alps. Link to post Share on other sites
mattlucas 0 Posted August 3, 2006 Share Posted August 3, 2006 That's just sad I cry when I think of Ontake being a part of the North Alps Link to post Share on other sites
tsondaboy 0 Posted August 3, 2006 Share Posted August 3, 2006 It is not even a part of the alps in general. Link to post Share on other sites
nzlegend 1 Posted August 3, 2006 Share Posted August 3, 2006 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Japanese_Alps&oldid=2106163 I checked earlier revisions of this page, it seem spud wasnt the only one with cybervandalism on his mind concerning the Japanese Alps! it seems someone else was questioning the sexuality of the Alps! Link to post Share on other sites
mattlucas 0 Posted August 3, 2006 Share Posted August 3, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by tsondaboy: It is not even a part of the alps in general. I don't even think that Yakedake and Norikura are in the North Alps if you look at them geologically Hotaka is the where they should end Link to post Share on other sites
damian 0 Posted August 3, 2006 Author Share Posted August 3, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by snowglider: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Japanese_Alps&oldid=2106163 I checked earlier revisions of this page, it seem spud wasnt the only one with cybervandalism on his mind concerning the Japanese Alps! it seems someone else was questioning the sexuality of the Alps! Mate, read it until the very end >>And the people eat fish. Link to post Share on other sites
SnowJapan.Com#2 0 Posted August 3, 2006 Share Posted August 3, 2006 I see, thanks. I suppose there's just so much to hate isn't there? Link to post Share on other sites
AET 0 Posted August 3, 2006 Share Posted August 3, 2006 So they do actually moderate entries quickly on there. What you wrote did sound a bit like a webmaster wanting a link to his site though, le spud, don't you think? Link to post Share on other sites
tsondaboy 0 Posted August 3, 2006 Share Posted August 3, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by Toque: Quote: Originally posted by tsondaboy: It is not even a part of the alps in general. I don't even think that Yakedake and Norikura are in the North Alps if you look at them geologically Hotaka is the where they should end You are correct about that, the Volcanoes in the area shouldn’t be considered a part of the Northern Alps which is a product of tectonism. The problem is that it is not easy to define the southern boundary of N. Alps precisely, since volcanism has replaced older structures. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts