Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is a follow-up to the quiz I posted in the "Where is this?" thread, with a bit of the history, at least as far as I have gathered so far. Photos and history lifted from various blogs.

 

Once upon a time, there was a small ski area in the mountains between Kinugawa Onsen and Shiobara Onsen, called Keichozan Ski Area (鶏頂山スキー場). Located at the base of Mt. Keichou, it was founded in 1961.

tel-tochigi-5.JPG

At its peak, it had two pair lifts, a single chair, and a rope tow. Basically 4 courses through the woods and a family course, max length 900 m, max steepness of 18 degrees. It was apparently a relatively quiet, local-style ski area, with an unfancy base area.

 

In 1969, a new, larger ski area was built to the north/left of it, called Keicho Kogen Miharashi Ski Area (鶏頂高原見晴):

gallery_10844_195_14784.jpg

In its early days, it was also apparently very basic, with a local-hill feel to it, but with longer runs.

 

In 1972, a new toll road connecting these two ski areas to Kinugawa Onsen and Shiobara Onsen was built, the Nichi-En Momiji Line.

 

25 years ago, during the bubble years, Hunter Mountain Shiobara was built to the north of these two ski areas (but not connected to them) on the Momiji Line. This was a modern-style resort, designed by the owners of Hunter Mountain resort in upstate New York in the US.

 

Following this, I guess the company that owned Keichozan ski area felt spurred to expand, and built a new ski are adjacent to the south, the Canadian-themed Maple Hill Ski Resort:

tel-tochigi-4.JPG

At that time, the three ski areas Keicho Kogen Miharashi, Keichozan and Maple hill were all linked:

gallery_10844_195_137279.jpg

(Note: North is to the left.)

 

gallery_10844_195_40157.jpg

That course map was placed at the top of the Maple Hill ski area, and apparently is still there.

 

However, despite all three ski areas being physically linked, only Keichozan and Maple Hill shared a common lift ticket, with Keicho Kogen Miharashi being separate. Skiers going from one side of the mountain to the other needed to buy single-ride tickets to get back.

 

Keichozan apparently retained an old-fashioned charm, with Maple Hill being the stylish foreign-themed resort.

jp-tochigi-20.JPG

 

At some point in the '90s (?), Keicho Kogen Miharashi did an image make-over, building a new Swiss-themed base station, and renaming themselves Edelweiss.

tel-tochigi-6.JPG

jp-tochigi-35.JPG

They also at some point upgraded some of their lifts from pair and single lifts to quads.

 

So now there were the American-themed Hunter Mountain, the Swiss-themed Edelweiss, the local-Japanese-style Keichozan, and Canadian-themed Maple Hill ski resort, all on the Momiji Line, which could apparently get pretty crowded at times.

 

Maple Hill seems to have been reasonably popular for a while:

jp-tochigi-27.JPG

But eventually it fell victim to the post-bubble malaise, and it went out of business at the end of the 2000 season, taking Keichozan down with it.

One can find reports here and there on the web of hikers going up through the remains of the Maple Hill and Keichozan ski areas to get to the peak of Mt. Keicho, where there is a shrine (sometimes skiing back down).

 

According to such reports, the lifts at Maple Hill and Keichozan ski areas have been completely removed, but the buildings, and nighter light towers at Maple Hill, remain.

 

Keichozan base as of 2010:

keichoDSC_0005.JPG

Maple Hill base as of 2010:

mapleDSC_0009.JPG

Edelweiss remains in business. They have put up fences on their southern edge so visitors cannot inadvertently slide into the defunct areas, from which there would be no easy way back. It is a bit smaller than Hunter, but features a dog run, a feature I heartily approve of (and have made use of), and free parking.

 

So RIP Keichozan and Maple Hill, and gambare Edelweiss!

 

Primary sources (credit where due) -- for more details and pictures, see the following:

(Note: permission obtained from SJ to post these links)

http://snow-reports....chigi.htm#maple

http://blogs.yahoo.c...97/1936828.html

http://old-skier.see.../157131752.html

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of these places sure do have complicated histories don't they.

 

However, despite all three ski areas being physically linked, only Keichozan and Maple Hill shared a common lift ticket, with Keicho Kogen Miharashi being separate. Skiers going from one side of the mountain to the other needed to buy single-ride tickets to get back

 

:doh:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Musashi-maru,

 

I live in Ibaraki, sort of equidistant (or more precisely, equal-driving-time) from ski areas in Tochigi, Fukushima and northern Gunma.

 

As far as I can tell, Tochigi has had a particularly high failure rate for ski areas. 12-13 years ago they had 10 ski areas operating, now only 5. I think in general they don't get great snowfall in winter, and their ski industry only made sense for its accessibility to Tokyo (and to a lesser extent Chiba and Ibaraki), but with the passing of the latest ski boom (recalling that there has been more than one) hard reality has come home to roost.

 

I like to root for the underdog, so I hope that any losses that will be suffered have already been suffered. But, no guarantee of course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that. I guess if you add a lot of these types of places together, you get a history of the Japanese economy and Japanese demographics.

 

The two resorts that closed look well flat in those photos.

 

With cheap flights appearing in recent years, I think Tokyo people are more inclined to go to Hokkaido over Tohoku. That was even before the disaster.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the subject of Ibaraki, I'll just add that I think Mito is the greenest city I've been to in Japan.

Its got huge parks right in the center of town. It must be great for folks who like to get outside and people raising kids.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the subject of Ibaraki, I'll just add that I think Mito is the greenest city I've been to in Japan.

Its got huge parks right in the center of town. It must be great for folks who like to get outside and people raising kids.

 

That's one thing we have a lot of in Ibaraki, green space. :lol:

(If not much else!)

 

But it is nice for raising kids, I'll agree.

But then, surely Nagano is too?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's true, but the Hakuba valley is inaka.

While not Tokyo or Osaka, Mito is still a provincial capital. It means more economic activity and better jobs for the average person (I hope!).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got to wonder what the thinking was behind some of these places.

Was it more "I want to make a skijo" flippant kind of decision (if such a think is possible) or was there really a demand for the huge numbers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got to wonder what the thinking was behind some of these places.

Was it more "I want to make a skijo" flippant kind of decision (if such a think is possible) or was there really a demand for the huge numbers.

 

Dunno. But there used to be twice as many young people in Japan that there are now. It's a weird thing to get your head round, but that's what the numbers say.

 

Another one was that only about one million Japanese went abroad in 1970. Until the mid-1960s people had to apply to the government for permission to change currency. Imagine how many hankos that must have taken!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got to wonder what the thinking was behind some of these places.

Was it more "I want to make a skijo" flippant kind of decision (if such a think is possible) or was there really a demand for the huge numbers.

 

Dunno. But there used to be twice as many young people in Japan that there are now. It's a weird thing to get your head round, but that's what the numbers say.

 

Another one was that only about one million Japanese went abroad in 1970. Until the mid-1960s people had to apply to the government for permission to change currency. Imagine how many hankos that must have taken!

 

waaaaaaaaaaa-53792525433.jpeg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another interesting thing I have noticed is that a lot of ski areas were built by/in-cooperation-with the government.

 

Do a search on 国設スキー場, and you may be surprised how many ski areas were originally built by the government, particularly during the '60s and '70s. Kagura, for example, started out as 国設苗場山みつまた高原スキー場, eventually becoming privatized, I guess. Still working out the details

on what the story behind 国設スキー場 was, but it seems to have been a collaboration between the forestry agency (which controls the hillsides), the transportation agency (which regulates the lift system) and I guess local governments. Probably some mix of wanting to encourage the development of international-level winter sports, with some old-fashoned pork-barrel/stimulus/amakudari-busywork politics involved.

 

Then there was the Nikkei bubble and attendant ski boom in the late '80s/early '90s, during which building a ski area must have seemed like a license to print money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forestry land became worthless in the 50s (switch from wood/charcoal to oil heating) and 60s (switch to imported lumber).

 

One appeal of skijos and other manmade tourist attractions is that they can justify building roads at government expense.

 

A survey in the newspaper today said that average household income is now 5.3 million yen a year, 1.2 million yen down from 1994. Thats a big drop in itself, but it means a much bigger drop in the money left over after stuff like housing and utils and kids college. fwiw, if this average income is distributed like average salaries in Japan, at least 70% of households won't pull in that much.

 

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20120706a4.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

5.3 million I imagine goes a whole lot further in inaka than in the middle of Tokyo.

 

You can be sure of that, though your chances of pulling that much in will be much lower.

 

I wonder what would happen if average household income fell by 15% in the UK or US.

I'd like to think there would be more talk about it in the media.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just noticed this one now.

Very interesting stuff there Metabo.

Must have been a fun and heady time back in the boom days when people were splashing the cash at things hey.

Link to post
Share on other sites
×
×
  • Create New...