rider69 18 Posted September 3, 2010 Share Posted September 3, 2010 I havent been to a port city in the world that looks rather nice Link to post Share on other sites
HelperElfMissy 42 Posted September 3, 2010 Share Posted September 3, 2010 Originally Posted By: rider69 I havent been to a port city in the world that looks rather nice Fremantle's not too bad. Compared. Link to post Share on other sites
SKI 15 Posted September 3, 2010 Author Share Posted September 3, 2010 Here's some for starters: Barcelona Naples Venice Palermo I'm sure there are many many more. Link to post Share on other sites
SKI 15 Posted September 3, 2010 Author Share Posted September 3, 2010 Goderich Dublin Rotterdam Amsterdam Link to post Share on other sites
SKI 15 Posted September 3, 2010 Author Share Posted September 3, 2010 Genova Cochin Er, Liverpool etc etc etc Link to post Share on other sites
thursday 1 Posted September 3, 2010 Share Posted September 3, 2010 Hull Link to post Share on other sites
RobBright 35 Posted September 3, 2010 Share Posted September 3, 2010 Wigan Link to post Share on other sites
big-will 7 Posted September 3, 2010 Share Posted September 3, 2010 Originally Posted By: RobBright Wigan ...is not a port. Link to post Share on other sites
Slippery Jim 65 Posted September 3, 2010 Share Posted September 3, 2010 Brooklyn Link to post Share on other sites
thursday 1 Posted September 3, 2010 Share Posted September 3, 2010 Mogadishu Link to post Share on other sites
Thundercat 60 Posted September 3, 2010 Share Posted September 3, 2010 Vancouver But be careful guys, he said HE hasn't been to a port city that looks rather nice... not port cities don't look nice. Link to post Share on other sites
thursday 1 Posted September 3, 2010 Share Posted September 3, 2010 Portland, Oregon. Link to post Share on other sites
rider69 18 Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 Last time I was in Van I had a crack dealer try to sell me crack. I watched an addict search the ground for used fags. Also saw a fight! All in about a 15 minute time frame. Link to post Share on other sites
SantaCruz 0 Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 Originally Posted By: thursday Portland, Oregon. Portland is on a river, but not on the ocean. So depending on what you mean by a port. But def some good food and beer going on there Link to post Share on other sites
ckang008 0 Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 I'll definitely prefer Shinkansen than flying. At least you don't have to transfer numerous time to get to Niseko and probably just take the same amount of time without the risk of traffic congestion or extended wait time. I wonder how will this affect the real estate market over at Kutchan once completed. I've been thinking of purchasing a place in Kutchan or Hirafu in the next couple of years as a resort home. Link to post Share on other sites
rider69 18 Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 Quote: At least you don't have to transfer numerous time to get to Niseko and probably just take the same amount of time without the risk of traffic congestion or extended wait time A snow storm will seriously effect this line. Most of the Shinkansen lines dont run through snow country and if they due it is mostly tunnels. Link to post Share on other sites
muikabochi 208 Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 Joetsu Shinkansen is out of tunnels from between Urasa and Nagaoka. It seems to cope pretty good with snow storms which can affect Nagaoka area. Link to post Share on other sites
Thundercat 60 Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 Flying domestic in Japan is far better than any country I've ever been to... check ins 15 mins before departure, easy train/bus access to the airport, quick and efficient security checks... it's a pretty hassle free experience in my opinion. The new Shizuoka airport (massive waste of taxes) even offers free parking for extended trips. I think there will be little incentive for people to take the train to Hokkaido (expect for all the train geeks who are drooling over this idea) Link to post Share on other sites
RobBright 35 Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 Depends BM - For those in Eastern Japan - it could be quicker to get to Kutchan via Shinkansen. Link to post Share on other sites
sanjo 2 Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 I don't think the shink is really affected by strong winds. And in Yuzawa they have sprinklers clearing the rails. I'm sure they aren't free, but the point is that they seem to cope admirably in really bad conditions. The only thing that can stop the Joetsu shink is a shindo 7 earthquake happening 10km away when it goes by. Link to post Share on other sites
sanjo 2 Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 Don't know what the prices are, but I would prefer a shink over a plane and any hassles accompanying them any day. Link to post Share on other sites
Slippery Jim 65 Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 Not to dispute that Japan makes domestic flights pretty easy, it certainly does, but I think there will be plenty of people who'd opt for shinkansen to Niseko. I live pretty equal travel time to Haneda or Tokyo, and for the sake of argument let's say transfer/check-in time is about the same for 7 a.m. departure. Shinkansen: arrive Kutchan 10:45, taxi to Hirafu, lodging at 11 Plane: arrive Chitose 8:30, wait required hour for bus at 9:30, 2.5 hours to Hirafu parking lot at noon. Of course taking the train would mean missing that $1 million toilet with the player grand piano, but sometimes sacrifices simply must be accepted. Link to post Share on other sites
SKI 15 Posted September 6, 2010 Author Share Posted September 6, 2010 But how much of the Hokkaido stretch is planned to be in tunnels? Link to post Share on other sites
SKI 15 Posted September 6, 2010 Author Share Posted September 6, 2010 Originally Posted By: Slippery Jim Not to dispute that Japan makes domestic flights pretty easy, it certainly does, but I think there will be plenty of people who'd opt for shinkansen to Niseko. I live pretty equal travel time to Haneda or Tokyo, and for the sake of argument let's say transfer/check-in time is about the same for 7 a.m. departure. Shinkansen: arrive Kutchan 10:45, taxi to Hirafu, lodging at 11 Plane: arrive Chitose 8:30, wait required hour for bus at 9:30, 2.5 hours to Hirafu parking lot at noon. I agree. It's not just about flying time etc, there's that 2.5 hour bus from the airport to add as well. Link to post Share on other sites
Slippery Jim 65 Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 Also, any weather severe enough to shut down a shinkansen line would very probably also shut down Chitose airport. Of course, JR may never provide the kind of subsidies that make package trips to ski in Hokkaido so inexpensive, and you might wind up paying a premium over flying. But it'll be good to have the choice. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts