Jump to content

Another big earthquake in Niigata. (It's not fair).


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 134
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It was very strong here in Minakami (northern Gunma, just to the south of Yuzawa). As with the Chuetsu, it moves more here than in Yuzawa which seems to have a relatively strong base or whatever you call it. Go out into the valley though Muikamachi and it is much more prone to moving.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually attenuation works best through sediments rather than massive formations. \:\)

 

To give you a good example on that, it is the same as if you put a pillow over a clock and put your ear on the pillow to hear the ticking sound and try to do the same but cover the clock with a frying pan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You'd want some compressibilty, and the water column won't give you that. I was thinking of attenuation of shear. That is trying to accelerate a mass horizontally by moving its base, and leaving the top behind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We had quite a big aftershock here about an hour ago as well. It's a strange feeling similar to being on a boat. I have now experienced a few over the last 9 months. I feel safe in my building as it it a very solid construction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what is it with Niigata? are you guys low on Karma or what? the past few years have been hellish with quakes, floods, snowstorms. If any of you guys want move on down to Nara, you are welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've found a focal mechanism solution for yesterday's main event.

 

The fault runs parallel with the coast and the movement was an oblique thrust to the NW. What that means it that the rocks on the SE side of the fault slipped under the rocks to the NW. FWIW, thrust, or reverse faults have the greatest capacity to store strain, and therefore are responsible for the strongest earthquakes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Moment tensor solution always gives you 2 planes, like in the USGS pick. You can’t really say just by one solution, which is the plane that represents the fault. Usually the distribution of the aftershocks gives you a good idea of the geometry of the area that has slipped. The distribution up to now points to an East dipping thrust.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the strain has been released, so that part of the fault is relaxed. Strain is a slippery thing though. How long do you intend to stay in one of the most earthquake prone areas of one of the most earthquake countries?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very good question.

Yes, earthquakes do trigger avalanches although I think it is pretty rare to have casualties as a result.

There was a case in my hometown quite a years back where 4 people got killed after an earthquake triggered an avalanche. Very very unlucky as earthquakes are very rare in that neck of the woods.

Link to post
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...